雅思写作话题及范文:Write about the following topic:Governments should sp...

雅思写作话题及范文:Write about the following topic:Governments should sp...

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Write about the following topic:

Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Write at least 250 words.

您应该在这项任务上花费大约40分钟。

写下以下主题：

政府应该把钱花在铁路而不是公路上。

你在多大程度上同意或不同意这一说法？

给出你的答案的理由，并包括你自己的知识或经验中的任何相关例子。

至少写250个单词。

范文

As far as I am concerned, governments have the responsibility to fund construction of infrastructure, no matter whether it is rails or roads as both modes of transport are invested with their own functions.

Investment in road schemes could carry immeasurable benefits to all road users including drivers, pedestrians and cyclists. This is primarily because smooth, smart and sustainable roads may decrease the likelihood of external social costs they entail such as congestion, accidents, pollution and depletion of oil resources, and so on. As well as reducing costs, roads surpass railways as they facilitate personal and goods transport in a more flexible and convenient way. Such flexibility and convenience could be further promoted with financial support from the government, which in turn prosper regional economy.

In contrast to road travel which enhances individual mobility at a relatively higher cost, railway transport has long been known as being cost-effective and being able to deliver large quantities of bulk materials and large queues of passengers in a swift way. Also noteworthy is that despite considerable loss of cropland in construction and occasional unpunctuality, railway transport is capable of carrying goods to those inaccessible faraway areas like mountainous regions or isolated wilderness regions. As a result of this, the investment in railway construction would to a large extent accelerate trade within or beyond national boundaries.

In both cases, besides boosting regional and national economy, the infuse of governmental fund into the construction of both modes of transport could boost the development of modern logistics, thereby creating more employment opportunities, and enhancing income opportunities.

All in all, both rails and roads make up the backbone of transport in a country, as a result of which, governments cannot afford to neglect either.

就我而言，政府有责任为基础设施建设提供资金，无论是铁路还是公路，因为这两种运输方式都有各自的功能。

对道路计划的投资可以给所有道路使用者带来不可估量的好处，包括司机、行人和自行车手。这主要是因为平坦、智能和可持续的道路可能会降低外部社会成本的可能性，例如拥堵、事故、污染和石油资源耗竭等。在降低成本的同时，公路也超越了铁路，因为公路以更灵活、更便捷的方式便利了个人和货物运输。在政府的财政支持下，可以进一步促进这种灵活性和便利性，从而繁荣区域经济。

与以相对较高的成本提高个人机动性的公路运输相比，铁路运输长期以来一直被认为具有成本效益，能够快速运送大量散装材料和大量排队的乘客。同样值得注意的是，尽管在建设过程中大量损失农田，而且偶尔不准时，但铁路运输能够将货物运送到偏远地区，如山区或与世隔绝的荒野地区。因此，铁路建设投资将在很大程度上加速国内外贸易。

在这两种情况下，除了促进区域和国家经济，政府资金注入两种运输方式的建设可以促进现代物流的发展，从而创造更多的就业机会，增加收入机会。

总之，铁路和公路都是一个国家的交通支柱，因此，政府也不能忽视这一点。

>> 雅思 托福 免费测试、量身规划、让英语学习不再困难<<